Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Etnokomputasi Terintegrasi Cerita Rakyat Untuk Meningkatkan Computational Thinking Siswa Sekolah Dasar

Muhammad Zidni Ilman Nafi'a, Moh Hanif Adzhar

Abstract


This study aims to develop an interactive ethnocomputing multimedia program integrated with the Tirta Amerta Sari story to enhance the computational thinking skills of elementary school students. The background of this study is based on the importance of developing computational thinking skills from an early age, as well as the need for contextual and engaging learning media. This study employed the Research and Development (R&D) method using the ADDIE model, which includes the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research subjects were 28 fifth-grade students at SDN 1 Lawang. The instruments used included an expert validation sheet, a computational thinking test in the form of image matching and descriptive tasks, and a student response questionnaire. The results showed that the developed interactive multimedia was rated as “highly suitable” based on expert validation of the multimedia, language, and content. The pilot test results showed an improvement in students’ computational thinking skills, with the average pretest score of 58.21 increasing to 82.14 on the posttest, and an N-Gain value of 0.57 in the moderate category. The t-test results showed a significant difference between the pretest and posttest (Sig. < 0.05). Thus, interactive ethnocomputing multimedia integrated with historical narratives is effective in improving the computational thinking skills of elementary school students.

Keywords: Educational Multimedia, Ethnocomputing, Computational Thinking, Local Wisdom


Full Text:

PDF

References


Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3).

Arikunto, S. (2021). Penelitian tindakan kelas: Edisi revisi. Bumi Aksara.

Babbitt, W., Lachney, M., Bulley, E., & Eglash, R. (2015). Adinkra Mathematics : A study of Ethnocomputing in Ghana 1. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2015.1399

Branch, R. M., & Stefaniak, J. E. (2019). Instructional design theory. In Open and distance education theory revisited: implications for the digital era (pp. 85–94). Springer.

Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational thinking. Mit Press.

Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., Taylor, V., & Geier, S. R. (2013). Culturally responsive computing in urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education, 48(5), 629–656.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational Thinking: A Competency Whose Time Has Come. In S. Sentence, E. Barendsen, & C. Schulte (Eds.), Computer Science Education: Perspectives on Teaching and Learning in School (pp. 20–38). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hsu, T. C., & Chang, S. C. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 127, 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.015

Hutchison, L., & McAlister-Shields, L. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching: Its application in higher education environments. Education Sciences, 10(5), 124.

Hwang, G.-J., & Chien, S.-Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100082.

Irawati, L., & Hadi, M. S. (2025). Computataional Thinking dalam Pengembangan Berpikir Matematis di Sekolah Dasar. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 2358–2364.

Khaulani, F., Neviyarni, S., & Irdamurni, I. (2020). Fase dan tugas perkembangan anak sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 51–59.

Lachney, M., Green, B., Allen, M. C., & Foy, L. (2021). Ethnocomputing and computational thinking. In Computational thinking in education (pp. 112–135). Routledge.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). How multimedia can improve learning and instruction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023094

Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020). Educational innovation in higher education: Use of role-playing and educational video in future teachers’ training. Sustainability, 12(6), 2558.

OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. A Series of Concept Notes.

Papadakis, S. (2021). Tools for evaluating educational apps for young children: a systematic review of the literature. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 18–49

Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158.

Tang, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers and Education, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798

Waruwu, M. (2024). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D): Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(2), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2141




DOI: https://doi.org/10.61689/waspada.v14i2.1272

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.61689/waspada.v14i2.1272.g807

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.