Pendidikan Demokrasi di Era Artificial Intelligence: Penguatan Literasi Kewargaan untuk Menghadapi Disinformasi, Ujaran Kebencian, dan Polarisasi
Abstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed democratic practices by reshaping the dissemination of information, political communication, and citizen participation in digital spaces. At the same time, AI has heightened the risks of disinformation, hate speech, deepfakes, and polarization, which may undermine the quality of democracy. This study aims to analyze the role of democratic education in strengthening civic literacy to address these challenges. The study employs a qualitative approach using a library research method and analyzes various scholarly literature and policy documents through content analysis. The findings indicate that democratic education needs to integrate digital literacy, AI literacy, critical thinking skills, digital ethics, and responsible civic participation. These strategies can be implemented through the integration of AI literacy into Pancasila and Civic Education learning, the application of participatory problem-based learning, and the enhancement of teachers’ competencies. These efforts are expected to foster critical, adaptive, and character-driven digital citizens, enabling AI to be utilized as a means of strengthening democratic values.
Keywords: Democratic Education, Artificial Intelligence, Civic Literacy, Disinformation, Polarization.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arribas, C. M., Arcos, R., & Gertrudix, M. (2025). Rethinking education and training to counter AI-enhanced disinformation and information manipulations in Europe: A Delphi study. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1).
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2025.2501759
Buchan, M. C., Bhawra, J., & Katapally, T. R. (2024). Navigating the digital world: Development of an evidence-based digital literacy program and assessment tool for youth. Smart Learning Environments, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00293-x
Castellví, J., Massip Sabater, M., & González-Valencia, G. A. (2022). Future teachers confronting extremism and hate speech: The role of education in democratic citizenship. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 201. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01222-4
Chueca del Cerro, C. (2024). The power of social networks and social media's filter bubble in shaping polarisation: An agent-based model. Applied Network Science, 9, 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-024-00679-3
Coeckelbergh, M. (2023). Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: Political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics, 3, 1341–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4
DiPaola, D., Aidinoff, M., Marzilli, A., Berman, E., Champigny, M., Gundy, N., Yezzi, S., & Breazeal, C. (2024). AI literacy as civic literacy: A case study of the "AI and human rights" curriculum for middle school students. First Monday, 29(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i12.13869
Eroglu, M. H., Finkel, S. E., Neundorf, A., et al. (2025). Choosing democracy over party? How civic education can mitigate the anti-democratic effects of partisan polarization. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123425000203
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Gagrčin, E., Porten-Cheé, P., Leißner, L., Emmer, M., & Jørring, L. (2022). What makes a good citizen online? The emergence of discursive citizenship norms in social media environments. Social Media + Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221084297
Geers, M., Swire-Thompson, B., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S. M., Kozyreva, A., & Hertwig, R. (2024). The Online Misinformation Engagement Framework. Current Opinion in Psychology, 55, 101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101739
Germani, F., Spitale, G., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2024). The dual nature of AI in information dissemination: Ethical considerations. JMIR AI, 3, e53505. https://doi.org/10.2196/53505
Halimi, M., Rahmat, R., Nugraha, R. A., & Pratiwi, E. D. (2022). Young digital citizen answers: Can online learning improve the quality of civic education learning? Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 99–109. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/40140
Hoes, E., Aitken, B., Zhang, J., Gackowski, T., et al. (2024). Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01884-x
Huschle, L., Kindlinger, M., & Abs, H. J. (2024). Personal responsibility and beyond: Developing a comprehensive conceptualization of digital citizenship competences. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.wjds/4.4.5
Isabella, I., Alfitri, A., Saptawan, A., Nengyanti, N., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Empowering digital citizenship in Indonesia: Navigating urgent digital literacy challenges for effective digital governance. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i2.19258
Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
Jungherr, A., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2024). Negative downstream effects of alarmist disinformation discourse: Evidence from the United States. Political Behavior. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-024-09911-3
Kusnadi, K., Sapriya, S., Budimansyah, D., & Wahab, A. A. (2023). Analyzing a project-based blended learning model for citizenship education to foster humanity literacy. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 20(1), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i1.58858
Lathrop, B. N. (2025). Confronting the Post-Truth Phenomenon in Literacy Education: The Need for a Critical Media Epistemology. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1407
Lilja, J., Eklund, N., & Tottie, E. (2024). Civic literacy and disinformation in democracies. Social Sciences, 13(8), 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13080405
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1
Maulana, M. Y., & Milanti, A. A. (2023). A systematic literature review on civic engagement program through citizenship education. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i2
Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391104
Nurjanah, N., Abdulkarim, A., Komalasari, K., Bestari, P., & Suwandi, M. A. (2024). Critical literacy of young citizens in the digital era. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 21(2), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i2.70232
Pawelec, M. (2022). Deepfakes and democracy (theory): How synthetic audio-visual media for disinformation and hate speech threaten core democratic functions. Digital Society, 1, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00010-6
Perez-Mugg, M. (2025). Instruction in the Age of Misinformation: Pedagogical Implications for Educating Responsible Knowers. Educational Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.70008
Ridha, M. K., Mulyono, B., & Yulianto, E. M. (2025). Algorithmic echo chamber as a challenge of digital citizenship in discourse polarization on TikTok social media. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppkn.v6i2.99133
Rodilosso, E. (2024). Filter bubbles and the unfeeling: How AI for social media can foster extremism and polarization. Philosophy & Technology, 37(71). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00758-4
Schmitt, J. B., Baake, J., & Kero, S. (2024). What means civic education in a digitalized world? Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1257247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1257247
Stitzlein, S. M. (2024). Populist challenges to truth and democracy met with pragmatist alternatives in citizenship education. Educational Theory, 74(5), 595–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12614
Sukmayadi, T., dkk. (2024). Membangun keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa melalui literasi kewarganegaraan di Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 12(2). https://journal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/dimensi/article/view/9388
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research.
https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
Vallès-Peris, N., & Domènech i Argemí, M. (2024). Digital citizenship at school: Democracy, pragmatism and RRI. Technology in Society, 76, 102448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102448
Von Gillern, S., Gould, H., Gannon, M., & Haskey-Valerius, B. (2024). Digital citizenship and its relevance for literacy education: Perspectives of preservice teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 47(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-024-00059-5
Wieczorek, M. (2025). Why AI will not Democratize Education: A Critical Pragmatist Perspective. Philosophy & Technology, 38(1). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-025-00883-8
Zidouemba, M. T. (2025). Governance and artificial intelligence: The use of artificial intelligence in democracy and its impacts on the rights to participation. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163-025-00229-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61689/waspada.v14i2.1269
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.61689/waspada.v14i2.1269.g802
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 13 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




