PENGARUH FAKTOR – FAKTOR DALAM PERSPEKTIF FRAUD TRIANGLE TERHADAP KECURANGAN PELAPORAN KEUANGAN (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2016 – 2019)

Ratna Herawati, Amalia Nur Chasanah, Masitha Fahmi Wardani, Risanda Alirastra Budiantoro

Abstract


This study empirically examines the effectiveness of Cressey’s (1953) fraud risk factor framework adopted in SAS No. 99 in detection of financial statement fraud. According to Cressey’s theory pressure, opportunity and rationalization are always present in fraud situations. The variables of the fraud triangle used is pressure proxied by ACHANGE, FREEC, and FINANCE, opportunity proxied by BDOUT, TRN, and CEO_TRN, rationalization proxied by AUDSWITCH. This population of study was company listed on the Stock Exchange, and then the samples were taken by purposive sampling criteria the company’s corporate criteria sanctioned from Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. The total sample of 106 companies that the company is comprised of 49 companies that commit fraud financial reporting and 57 companies that are not financial reporting fraud by the similarity of firms in the industry, the year and the amount of total assets of the company. This study uses logistic regression statistical. The results of this study indicate that the opportunities proxied by TRN and CEO_TRN, rationalization proxied by AUDSWITCH effect on financial statement fraud and pressure are proxied by ACHANGE, FREEC, FINANCE and opportunities proxied by BDOUT no effect on financial statement fraud.


Full Text:

PDF

References


ACFE. (2002). Report to Nation. Http://Marketplace.Cfenet.Com/Download.Asp.

Cressey, D. . (1953). Other People’s Money. NJ: Patterson Smith.

Dunn, P. (2004). Journal of Management, 30, 397–412.

Gagola, S. A. (2011). Analisis Faktor Risiko yang Mempengaruhi

Kecenderungan Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS (3rd ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I., & Chariri, A. (2007). Teori Akuntansi (3rd ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Lou, Y.-I., & Wang, M.-L. (2011). Fraud Risk Factor Of The Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 7(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i2.2262

Pernyataan Standar Auditing (PSA) No.70. (2001).

Rachmawati, K. K. (2014). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3, 1–30.

Rini, V. Y., & Achmad, T. (2012). Analisis Prediksi Potensi Risiko Fraudulent Financial Statement melalui Fraud Score Model. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1, 1–15.

Sari, T. P., & Lestari, D. I. T. (2020). Analisis Faktor Risiko Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud : Prespektif Diamond Fraud Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 20(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v20i2.618

Sekaran, U. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Salemba Empat.

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13(99), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005

Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS) No.99. (2002).

Suratman Hadi Priyano. (2017). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Oleh Auditor Eksternal. Parameter, 2(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.37751/parameter.v2i1.8

Wijayani Ratna, D. (2014). Analisa Fraud Triangle untuk Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. Universitas Diponegoro.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.61689/bisecer.v5i1.294

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 145 times
PDF - 59 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.