MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI PENEGAKAN DEMOKRASI DAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS PEMILUKADA

Mohamad Fakih

Abstract


The Constitutional Court was not born only to maintain and uphold the Constitution, the Constitutional Court will continue to defend democracy was thus born. Because of the elections is now entered the realm of the general election regime, constitutionally, the authority of the Constitutional Court to resolve election disputes are the results in the paragraph of article 24C sub section (1) the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. Only then the legitimacy of the formal authority of the Constitutional Court explicitly mentioned in the general election dispute referred to in article 236C of the law number 12 year 2008, concerning the amendment of law number 32 of 2004. In the settlement of the election dispute General, the Court not is based only on the results of the calculation of quantitative of the number of votes have been counted, but the Court made a breakthrough that the calculations which, if it is that there is a difference in the calculation of the noise exposure of the door to manipulation that is structural systematic and massive, then the role of democratization and the Court to defend the constitutionality of the general election that is an essential step to bring into the substantive justice

Keywords: Constitutional Court, Democracy, Constitutional


Full Text:

PDF

References


David Beetham (edt) Defining and Measuring Democracy, Sage Publication, Ltd London, 1994

Guy S Goodwin-Gill, Pemilu Jurdil: Pengalaman dan standar International (Free and Fair Election: International Standar and Practices) diterjemahkan oleh Nurhasan, diterbitkan oleh PIRAC bekerjasama dengan The Asia Foundation, Jakarta, 1999

Mohtar Mas'oed, Negara, Kapital, dan Demokrasi, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 1994

Harris G Warrren„ Harry D. Leinenweber. Ruth O.M. Andersen, Our Democracy of Work, Prentice-Hall Inc. USA, 1963

Robert A Dahl. sebagaimana dikutip oleh Affan Gatar, Politik Indonesia; Transisi Menuju Demokrasi, cet ke II, Pustaka Pelajar, Jogjakarta, 2000.

Sekretariat Jenderal Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, “Membangun Demokrasi Substantif , Meneguhkan Integritas Institusi, Laporan Tahunan 2010â€,. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta, 2010

Todung Mulya Lubus. “Pelajaran dari Pilkada Jawa Timurâ€, Media Online Gagasan Hukum, diterbitkan Desember 25, 2008, penerbit Hariyanto & Rekan, Advokat, Konsultan Hukum dan Politik, diakses dari gagasanhukum.wordpress.com/2008/12, print out tanggal 13 Agustus, 2011.

Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945

Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemerintah Daerah Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi

Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintah Daerah

Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintah Daerah

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) No. 15 Tahun 2008

Putusan MK Nomor 209-210/PHPU D-VIII/2011




DOI: https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v1i01.209

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 100 times
PDF - 15 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.